LAKANA Sovereign Systems · reviewer surface
Claim-to-Evidence Matrix
Every major public claim is mapped to evidence status, current boundary, reviewer attack surface, safer wording, and what must not be implied.
Evidence-bounded wordingSimulation separated from validationNo medical diagnosisNo emergency-service certificationNo official weather authorityNo crop-yield guarantee
Claim discipline
Major claims, evidence status, and safer wording.
Rule: LAKANA language should stay inside one of these tiers: architecture thesis, client-side simulation, Monte Carlo evidence, empirical-support-resolved simulation, source-governed manuscript package, prototype roadmap, or validation gap. Stronger claims require external field evidence.
| Public claim | Subsystem | Evidence status | Current boundary | Reviewer risk | Safer wording | Do not imply |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety intelligence without surveillance. | Global LAKANA | Architecture thesis | Design doctrine and public-safe demos; not proof all surveillance risk is eliminated. | Metadata, logs, responder sessions, coercion, and silent persistence. | LAKANA is designed to support bounded safety functions without making continuous surveillance the operating default. | Perfect privacy or zero leakage. |
| Physics-first protection. | W-X, SSI, SOS, TSARO | Architecture + simulation | Physical bounds are model-side constraints unless field-calibrated. | Which bounds are explicit, falsifiable, and validated? | Public actions are constrained by explicit physical, state, and governance bounds rather than open-ended behavioral inference. | Certified physical truth in deployment. |
| The integrated engine proves the full system works. | Integrated Engine | Simulation only | Client-side cross-stack arbitration demo; not production validation. | Demo may be mistaken for deployed proof. | The integrated engine demonstrates cross-stack arbitration behavior under public-safe simulated degraded states. | Deployment readiness or certification. |
| SOS coordinates local emergency state. | SOS / CivOS / BFB | SOS v71 Monte Carlo | No emergency-service certification; no rescue outcome guarantee. | Has it been field-tested with responders? | SOS demonstrates a governed emergency-state architecture with local minimization, admissibility gating, custody events, degraded transport, and rescue-scoped sessions. | 911 replacement, guaranteed rescue, or live responder approval. |
| CivOS improves degraded operation. | CivOS | Simulation evidence | Architecture-level Monte Carlo with modeled battery/connectivity/fallback. | Hardware and OS compromise remain unproven outside simulation. | CivOS is modeled as a local-first substrate for degraded mode, transport fallback, persistence, and authority contraction. | Production OS/hardware guarantee. |
| TSARO makes safe decisions. | TSARO | Governance logic | State orchestrator in simulations; not autonomous authority over people. | Who controls thresholds and appeals? | TSARO contracts, holds, degrades, blocks, or denies authority according to explicit state rules and uncertainty bounds. | Autonomous medical, legal, or emergency decision-maker. |
| NICOLE protects custody. | NICOLE | Architecture pattern | Audit/custody logic; not production cryptography certification. | Can logs leak sensitive metadata? | NICOLE records grant, denial, lease, expiration, handoff, closure, and non-release events while keeping raw-state release bounded. | Perfect cryptographic assurance or permanent evidence policy. |
| BFB/TAB enables responder bridge. | BFB / TAB | Architecture pattern | Typed request and session model; not legal authorization or responder certification. | Responder misuse, scope creep, silent access. | The proposed responder bridge uses typed requests, declared purpose, bounded session scope, announcement, closure, expiration, and audit. | Unrestricted responder access or legal compliance proof. |
| SSI protects athletes and workers. | SSI | Monte Carlo / event-history simulation | Not diagnosis, clinical validation, return-to-play, or worker surveillance authorization. | Medical overclaim and biological-limit language. | SSI provides structural-load simulation surfaces for modeled burden, retained time, authority contraction, and role-scoped release boundaries. | Clinical prevention or individual clearance. |
| SSI supports women’s sports equity. | SSI companion | Female-stack simulation | Women basketball, female soccer, and softball lanes are modeled separately; no sex-essentialist or clinical claim. | Overgeneralizing from simulation to biological conclusions. | SSI preserves women’s lanes in public simulation reporting so burdens and tradeoffs are not hidden inside pooled results. | Universal female biological outcome claim. |
| SSI event-history results show injury reduction. | SSI v94/J2 | AJ / Fine-Gray / Cox simulation | Internal event pathway coherence; not real-world incidence. | Reviewer reads model deltas as clinical incidence. | Public event-history outputs show modeled pathway differences under simulator assumptions. | Causal injury-prevention proof. |
| W-X / WX-Ag validates environmental truth. | W-X / WX-Ag | Empirical-support-resolved simulation | Not official weather authority or certified crop prediction. | Does it replace Mesonet, radar, NWS, or extension advice? | W-X/WX-Ag demonstrates freshness gating, contradiction handling, authority decay, and deterministic environmental-truth-state modeling. | Official forecast, regulatory weather, or crop guarantee. |
| WX-Ag improves yield. | WX-Ag | Secondary endpoint | Yield is a modeled secondary endpoint; not an agronomic guarantee. | Commercial yield overclaim. | WX-Ag reports secondary modeled yield endpoints to interpret environmental and water-stress pathway behavior. | Farm ROI or yield promise. |
| Adversarial rejection is robust. | W-X, SOS, TSARO | Simulation + scaffold tests | Anti-spoofing logic is demonstrated, not production-certified. | Replay, drift, root compromise, sensor tampering, and correlated spoofing. | Public simulations include fail-closed rejection, stale-state handling, and contradiction paths that require bench and field red-team validation. | Certified anti-spoofing or production security. |
| Research stack is journal-ready. | SSI / SOS / WX | Source-governed packages | Manuscripts and bundles are submission candidates; peer review is not complete. | Reviewer asks whether artifacts match claims and whether code/data are reproducible. | LAKANA maintains public research packages with manuscripts, figures, tables, registries, manifests, and claim boundaries for review. | Accepted publication or independent validation. |
| Validation roadmap closes the gap. | Global LAKANA | Roadmap | Future work, not evidence already obtained. | Roadmap language can sound like proof. | External validation should proceed through bench tests, prototype pilots, controlled field evaluation, privacy review, and partner-supervised trials. | Completed pilots unless documented. |