LAKANA Sovereign Systems · evidence atlas

Evidence without overclaiming.

This page turns the LAKANA research stack into a reviewer-readable evidence ledger. It separates simulation results, empirical support, source-governance outputs, prototype posture, and claims that remain outside the current evidence boundary.

Simulation-bound evidenceEmpirical support where statedNo field-validation claimNo medical diagnosisNo emergency-service certificationNo crop-yield guarantee
Evidence thesisThree research branches, one claim boundary.SSI tests modeled structural-burden pathways. SOS/CivOS tests local-first civilian safety architecture. W-X/WX-Ag tests environmental and agronomic truth-state behavior. The integrated engine composes them; it does not replace the branch evidence.
Public ruleStrong evidence, narrow wording.Every result below is interpreted as architecture, simulation, empirical-support, or governance evidence only. Field validation and deployment certification remain future work.

Reviewer route map

Use the right page for the right question.

Research stack ledger

Core public evidence anchors.

SSI J2 suite119 artifactsMain, companion, engineering supplement, concise summary, claim registry, provenance, figures, tables, and SHA256 manifest.
SOS v71250k + 500k250,000 full trials, 500,000 adversarial trials, 64 workers, connected empirical/proxy inputs, final core run.
W-X/WX-Ag v1020M trajectories16 scenarios at 1.25M trajectories per scenario with empirical weather, SOC, and SSURGO/effective-soil support.
Governance postureBounded releaseTSARO contracts authority; NICOLE records grant, denial, expiry, handoff, and non-release events.

SSI · Sovereign Structural Intelligence

Structural-load simulation evidence with women’s lanes preserved.

SSI results are reported as modeled structural-burden and retained-time behavior under simulator assumptions. The public evidence does not claim diagnosis, clinical injury prevention, return-to-play clearance, or individual athlete/worker decision authority.

Female-stack modeled years+0.256 / +0.220 / +0.149Women basketball, female soccer, and softball modeled-year deltas in the J2 companion stack.
Female missed days-77.79 / -68.31 / -38.43Women basketball, female soccer, and softball missed-day deltas, reported as simulation outputs.
Event-history supportAJ + Fine-Gray + CoxACL cumulative-incidence deltas are lower for SSI across the five public profiles in the v94 digest.
Sobol/GSA anchorfreeze_hazard_thresholdTop total-order parameter across RMST, burden, terminal proxy, NNR, and adversarial leakage summary metrics.
SSI anchorResultEvidence familyAllowed interpretationNot claimed
Female-stack lane preservationWomen basketball, female soccer, and softball retained as distinct public lanes.Companion J2 female tables; B=180 female stack.Women’s sport structure remains visible in simulation reporting.No sex superiority, clinical validation, or athlete-specific medical authority.
MEBVB / precision governanceWhole-frame B=390 interval [953,444.21, 1,205,922.71]; female stack B=180 interval [2,280,391.93, 3,111,841.08].SSES public table and engineering supplement.Burden-visibility and precision governance over public outputs.No real-world burden reduction proof.
RET-BURD female stack162 dominant favorable blocks and 18 managed-burden blocks.J2 SSES / companion evidence.Retained time is interpreted jointly with burden tradeoffs.No simple universal benefit score.
v94 event-history digestACL AJ deltas: basketball -0.686553, football -0.613533, female soccer -0.617219, male soccer -0.629936, softball -0.446001.Aalen-Johansen / cause-specific Cox / Fine-Gray.Internal event-pathway coherence under simulator design.No clinical incidence or causal injury-prevention claim.
SSI boundary: These are simulated modeled-burden, retained-time, and event-history outputs. They are not clinical validation, medical advice, return-to-play clearance, worker surveillance authorization, or field deployment evidence.

SOS / CivOS · civilian protection architecture

Local-first safety evidence under degraded infrastructure.

SOS v71 is the final core connected empirical Monte Carlo run for the SOS/CivOS branch, with optional movement/accountability/winter post-stack excluded. The run supports architecture-level simulation interpretation only.

Safe-state survivability0.975304LAKANA + CivOS simulation-internal estimate.
Comparator0.963996Industry-style centralized/cloud comparator, not a named vendor.
Delta+0.011308Bootstrap BCa interval approximately [0.010908, 0.011732].
Transport success0.939064 vs 0.674332LAKANA versus industry-style comparator under modeled transport conditions.
SOS anchorResultEvidence familyAllowed interpretationNot claimed
Run configuration250,000 full trials; 500,000 adversarial trials; 10 full batches; 10 environmental empirical batches; 64 workers; runtime about 600.49 seconds.v71 corrected preprint source bundle and runtime manifest summary.Large architecture-level Monte Carlo run with empirical/proxy inputs connected.No production certification.
Gate verdictPASS_CANONICAL_CANDIDATE after amended gate review.v71 editorial/gate posture.Core archive and manifest structure were coherent for public claim use.No field validation.
Empirical/proxy stackEnvironmental trace loaded; empirical transport calibration connected; all six GUIDE proxy lanes loaded and validated; TSARO temporal/timeline proxy inputs connected and validated.Evidence-tiered SOS run metadata.Connected simulation evidence with explicit source tiers.No live responder, hardware replay, or emergency-service benchmark.
Precision caveatAnytime precision did not stop under strict epsilon=0.001; final n=5,000,000 halfwidths about 0.001202 for architecture estimates and 0.002403 for deltas.Confidence-sequence / empirical-Bernstein diagnostic.Precision diagnostic is disclosed instead of hidden.No absolute precision certification.
SOS/CivOS boundary: This is a client-side/public-safe architecture and Monte Carlo evidence surface. It is not an emergency-service replacement, a field rescue guarantee, deployment certification, or proof that every real-world centralized system is inferior.

W-X / WX-Ag · environmental truth and agronomic pathways

Empirical support resolution with deterministic, physics-bounded proxies.

The W-X/WX-Ag v10 public record is a Zenodo-ready subset of a larger run archive. It reports environmental-truth and agronomic Monte Carlo outputs with source support checks and public-safe interpretation constraints.

Scale16 × 1.25M16 scenarios, 1,250,000 trajectories per scenario, 20,000,000 total trajectories.
Release gatepassEmpirical release gate passed in the public record.
Support resolution1.0 / 1.0 / 1.0Empirical weather fraction, SOC baseline resolved rate, and SSURGO/effective soil resolved rate across public rows.
Timing shiftup to +1248hMedian first-event timing relative to baseline in the public table summary.
W-X/WX-Ag anchorResultEvidence familyAllowed interpretationNot claimed
Empirical connectivityWeather support status EMPIRICALLY CONNECTED; carbon support EMPIRICAL BASELINE; soil support EMPIRICAL HYDRAULIC TARGET (GENERALIZED).Public support-resolution and connectivity tables.Public outputs are tied to explicit support-resolution checks.No official weather authority.
Burden movementMean degraded-valid burden ranges from Δ -1.515 days to +410.303 days; mean anoxia burden ranges from Δ -293.503 days to -75.684 days.Scenario burden summaries.Scenario-specific pathway movement under modeled environmental stress.No operational agronomic prescription.
Yield as secondary endpointReported yield increases relative to baseline range from +0.055926 to +0.226055.Key-findings table.Secondary simulation endpoint for pathway interpretation.No crop-yield guarantee.
Post-run notePublication tables were written before a later report-compilation failure on missing key 'wxag_deterministic_heat_wave'.Record provenance.Transparent reporting of artifact status.No claim that the final report-compilation stage finished cleanly.
W-X/WX-Ag boundary: These are empirical-support-resolved simulation outputs with proxy variables and public-safe summaries. They are not field agronomy validation, official forecasts, regulatory crop claims, or a guarantee of yield or hazard outcome.

Integrated interpretation

The website evidence posture is stronger because the branches stay separate.

Solo branches isolate mechanisms

SSI, SOS/CivOS, and W-X/WX-Ag each test different model families and should not be blended into one unsupported universal proof claim.

Integrated engine composes authorities

The full integrated engine tests degraded-state arbitration: which authority contracts, what is held, what expires, what is released, and what NICOLE logs.

Claim matrix governs wording

Public language must stay inside the evidence tier: modeled, simulated, empirical-support-resolved, native diagnostic, or roadmap-only.